MISHPATIM 1991
In
the Torah portion Mishpatim that before the Jewish people accepted the
Torah G-d gave them a sample of the Torah. These were the laws
that were stated in this Torah portion. It is interesting to note
that 90% of them have to do with the laws between man and man, how we
are to treat each other justly and correctly and honestly and how we
are to treat each other with dignity and respect. It says, "And
Moshe came and he told to the people all these words of G-d and all the
laws, and the people answered with one voice and they said, 'All the
things which G-d spoke we will do'." Then it says how Moshe wrote
all these words of G-d, these things of G-d, and he got up early in the
morning and he went and built an altar under the mountain and 12
pillars for the 12 tribes of Israel. Then we learn, too, how he
took the book of the covenant, and the rabbis say these were the laws
that were in this Torah portion, and he called into the ears of the
people and they said, "All which G-d spoke we will do and we will
understand." Notice that the people before had already said they
were going to do the laws. Now they said they would also
understand them, because it is not really enough just to do
things. You have to really understand what you are doing.
Judaism,
as we all know, stresses deed over creed. It is more important
what you do than what you say you are going to do or what you believe
in. What is important is what you do, so a person can understand
all about a particular charity he is giving to and he can understand
how it works and how the money is going to go to the poor and he can
investigate its officers and see that there is no graft and corruption,
and then he can think about how much he is going to give. Until
he actually writes that check he has not really fulfilled the mitzvah
even though he has spent many hours and maybe even days and weeks
investigating the charity. On the other hand, someone else could
just write a check, and the moment he writes the check he has a
mitzvah, although we all know there is a connection between what you
believe in and what you are going to do, but it is not always an
absolute connection. If people do not believe in democracy then,
of course, they are not going to vote, but many times we do believe in
democracy but we are lazy. We do not go and vote. In fact,
it is very interesting to note that the United States government and
the philosophy of the United States is very similar to Judaism.
What counts is what you do, not what you believe. You can say you
believe anything as long as you obey the law. That is all we care
about. Of course, it is a lot of harder to obey the law if you do
not really believe in it, so there is a connection but the connection
is ambiguous and nebulous, and the most important thing is what you
do. We in Judaism know that the most important thing is what you
do. You can think about all the mitzvahs you want, you can
understand 100% about how to put on tephillin and how tephillin are
made and what part of a cow the tephillin come from and what type of
animal the tephillin have to be made from, etc., but until you put on
tephillin you have not done the mitzvah. We know that the most
important thing is deed. Deed is more important than creed.
In
the very beginning the Jewish people said they would do, but later on
they also knew that they had to understand them because if they do not
understand them they do not understand how they relate to life and how
they cause them to have a better relationship with G-d and man, and
many Jews will not do them. That is, of course, why many Jews do
not come to shul to pray because they cannot see how Jewish prayer
causes them to come into contact with G-d and man, especially many Jews
who have gone to public schools and in public school, at least 20 or 30
years ago, they taught people how to pray and the way they taught
people how to pray was not the Jewish way of how to pray.
Therefore, there is a connection between how you understand life and
what you do. The connection is not absolute, though. The
most important thing is, are you obeying the law? If you are
obeying the law we leave you alone no matter what you say you
believe. That is similar to Judaism.
The truth of the
matter is that in many areas Judaism and America are very, very
similar. That is, of course, why the Jews have a hard time
maintaining themselves in America because there are so many
similarities. In America today we do not follow democracy.
Democracy in the classical Greek sense means the rule of the majority
and in America we are not a democracy because we do not follow the rule
of the majority. We are a limited democracy. Only in
certain areas of life do we follow the rule of the majority. For
example, if the majority of people would decide that I have to follow a
certain religion, I do not have to follow that religion. If the
majority of people decide that I cannot read certain newspapers, I can
still read those newspapers. We have freedom of the press,
freedom of assembly, freedom of religion. The police cannot come
into my house anytime they want even if the majority of people in
America think that they should. Even if the majority of people in
America think that it is wrong to burn an American flag they cannot
stop me from burning the flag. That is what the Supreme Court
recently said. The reason for that is the rule of the majority is
not absolute in America. We have a limited democracy. This
is what makes America great because in America we cannot tell the
individual what to do in certain areas even if it is the will of the
majority. Of course, they could pass a law in the Congress by
two-thirds and then get two-thirds of the states to pass it and then
they change the Constitution of America, but then we would no longer be
a limited democracy. We would no longer be America.
America, as we know it today, means that the majority does not rule in
certain areas.
That is what this whole Torah portion Mishpatim is
about, how people cannot have absolute power over everyone else.
Even with a slave and a master there are certain rights that a slave
has, that people in a marriage relationship cannot lord it one over the
other, that the poor have rights, that the creditor, even though the
poor owes a lot of money, cannot do anything he wants to get that money
back. Everyone is limited. We have to learn how to limit
our power. It is limitation of power which, of course, is one of
the central Jewish messages.
This lesson is very, very important
because people, when they say we live in a democracy, are not saying
what is the truth. In Germany when Hitler wanted to kill all the
Jews I dare say if they had an election (and Hitler was elected by the
majority) that the majority of the Germans would have voted to kill all
the Jews. In fact, there was fringe group of Jews headed by Max
Nahman who paraded around in Germany in the 1930's who represented a
thousand or less Jews, with signs saying, "We are guilty". In
other words, because the majority said that the Jews should be killed
he agreed with him that the Jews should be killed? He must be
some sort of a nut.
That is carrying a logical principle out to its
conclusion in a very consistent way but in a very foolish way. In
Judaism government is limited, and in Judaism the government must
uphold the Constitution and all its laws are reviewed by its
Constitution. The constitution is the Torah, both written and
oral. In fact, if the religious parties would ever come to power
in Israel there is really only one change that they want to make, and
that is that the Supreme Court of Israel should rule according to
Jewish law, not according to the hodgepodge of British, Turkish, and
Jewish law which now reigns, but they should rule according to Jewish
law. Of course, many people are very much afraid of this because
as in Jewish law there are many different opinions and they are afraid
that some ultra ultra ultras could get in and impose all sorts of
terrible things on the people. Of course, we have the same danger
in America. We have all sorts of interpretations of the American
Constitution, and if I dare say that if the view of certain members of
the current court would ever become majority we would also have certain
ultra ultra views put upon the American people. The nomentative
Jewish views are certainly more than in harmony with the American
views. In fact, there are many Halachic experts in the past and
the present who marvel that the founding fathers of this country could
have devised a form of government which so closely parallels the Jewish
form of government. In a way, it was no accident because many of
the early founders of this country were scholars, and they purposely
founded the government of the United States upon Jewish
principles. That is why they even said that a president had to be
native born, just as a Jewish king had to be native born. They
also limited the powers, just as the king's powers were limited.
The high priest and the king could not be the same. When a high
priest tried to assume the duties of the kingship he was actually
pelted by the people. That was Alexander Yanah. We know
that in many of the basic institutions of America this same system and
same way of thinking obtains as in Jewish thinking, which, of course,
had a bad side, too, because so many Jews find it so easy to assimilate
into America. We Jews play an equal role in America because
America is not a country which is based on ethnicity. American
nationality is defined by being loyal to the American ideal, which
means limited government. That is why in Russia today the Jews
have a hard time because Russian nationality and Russian ethnicity are
exactly the same thing. If you are not a Russian ethnic you
cannot be a Russian national. Being an American by nationality
has nothing to do with ethnicity, has nothing to do with what group you
come from. It is whether or not you subscribe to the American
ideal of limited government. If you subscribe to the ideal of
limited government then you are an American by nationality.
Also
in ancient Israel there was no reason why non-Jews could not
participate in the government. King David had many non-Jews in
his government. The only problem, of course, is when it comes to
specific Jewish issues they should not rule on them, just like today in
England it is absurd that Jewish members of Parliament should vote on
who is going to be the Archbishop of Canterbury or that Arabs in
Israeli Parliament should vote on who is a Jew. Jews should not
vote on anything that specifically deals with the Moslem community or
with the Christian community. That is their business to take care
of. However, there is no reason why on all other issues that are
common to all of us that people should not vote and participate.
In fact, in Europe and in Israel there is a different system than in
America as far as municipal elections. In America if you are not
a citizen you cannot vote in municipal elections, but in Europe and
Israel you do not have to be a citizen to vote in a municipal election
because garbage collection and police protection and schools also
impinge upon you. You are living in that community and you pay
taxes so you are allowed to vote. You are not allowed to vote in
national elections which determine other areas of national defense and
foreign policy, etc. Of course, there would be special bodies set
up for specific Jewish issues or Moslem issues, but in all instances
that we are talking about here a non-Jew can participate fully in a
Jewish state run according to Halachic principles. A Jewish
government is a limited government just as the United States has a
limited government.
Unfortunately, many people when they start
to think about democracy they are not thinking about the American model
of democracy, limited democracy. They are thinking about
democracy in the Greek way, which, of course, is a tyranny of the
majority. Therefore, we always have to remember that we do not
believe in democracy in America. We believe in a limited
democracy.
I am reminded of the story they tell about an
elephant who was sitting on the side of a riverbank. All of a
sudden he spied a snapping turtle on a log. Immediately he went
over and kicked him. The turtle flew 100 feet away. A
giraffe say it and went up to the elephant and said, "What did you do
that for?" The elephant replied, "Well, 50 years ago that
snapping turtle bit me." The giraffe said, "What a memory!"
The elephant looked at him and said, "Yes, turtle recall".
Unfortunately, there are many people who when they compare the Jewish
ideal of government to democracy remember only the Greek model.
They do not remember that the democracy we are talking about today is a
limited democracy. When we talk about limited democracy Judaism
and limited democracy are exactly parallel. Let us hope and pray
that we will continue to have a limited democracy in this country and
that the Jewish ideal of limited democracy will always hold sway in
Israel so the Mashiach will come. Amen.